Hybrids are hot — and not just among car buyers. As more advisors transition to independence these days, a growing number of them are choosing to adopt a hybrid business model that lets them conduct both commission-based brokerage business and fee-based advisory business. For many advisors, the hybrid road may offer the best of both worlds.

With that in mind, I want to share some insight into the hybrid landscape — including the two major types of hybrid business models — and examine some key issues that should be considered when comparing them.

The hybrid practice is one of the fastest-growing segments in the independent advisory business. Net head count at registered investment adviser (RIA) firms with dually registered hybrid advisors-those who are investment advisor representatives (IAR) and registered representatives (RR) — grew by 14.7% annually from 2004 through 2009, according to Cerulli Associates in a report last year. That's nearly three times the growth rate of RIA-only firms over the same period.

In sharp contrast, nearly all broker- dealer (BD) channels experienced flat to negative head count growth during the same period. At Schwab, more than 50% of the advisors who went independent in 2009 and 2010 became hybrid advisors. Going forward, market share in terms of advisor head count is expected to increase at firms with dually registered advisors and RIA-only firms at the expense of all other channels.

One reason for the hybrid model's growth is that there are more resources than ever to help advisors transition to the hybrid model. In addition, the hybrid advisors we work with tell us that they like having the ability to retain existing brokerage clients and preserve income streams generated by this legacy business.


The two hybrid models: Semi-captive vs. dually registered

If the idea of a hybrid practice intrigues you, there are two commonly used business models you can choose from, based on the level of autonomy and choice you wish to have in your practice.

Under the semi-captive model, an advisor becomes an employee (or independent contractor) of an independent broker-dealer and joins the corporate RIA of the IBD. The advisor is a registered representative under the IBD and an independent advisor representative under the IBD's corporate RIA. This is the route often taken by individuals and smaller teams as a first step in going independent.

In the dually registered model an advisor joins an existing independent RIA firm — or starts his or her own RIA — and is an independent contractor of an IBD. The advisor is registered as an independent advisor representative of the independent RIA firm and is a registered representative under the IBD.

Once an advisor has made the decision to go hybrid, choosing the appropriate business model depends on several factors. In a typical semi-captive model, the IBD offers an existing platform of products, model portfolios and other solutions that the advisor can easily access right out of the gate. That said, semi-captive advisors of an IBD may be required to use only the approved options on that platform. In contrast, dually registered hybrid advisors (especially those who start their own RIAs) generally have significantly greater flexibility in choosing advisory solutions —although their IBD may still limit investment choices on the brokerage side of the business. A restricted platform of solutions can do a great job at meeting your clients' objectives and may not feel restrictive at all. Conversely, you may find that your clients require a set of advanced solutions that only a highly customized and flexible approach can satisfy.

Infrastructure and service model support

The semi-captive model typically offers a high level of built-in infrastructure support through the IBD, similar in many ways to the level of support wirehouse brokers typically receive. There are IBDs that offer turnkey solutions for common functions like reporting, technology and rebalancing, essentially eliminating the need to source support from outside vendors. This makes the semi-captive model a more comfortable choice for some advisors in transition, though they are typically wedded to the IBD's chosen systems and there may be little ability for advisors to customize.

Dually registered hybrid advisors, by contrast, may find themselves with less of a built-in support network, but they'll almost certainly have more freedom to select from a variety of vendors and technology, enabling them to tailor their infrastructure around their specific practices.

When differentiating between hybrid models, advisors should think about what kinds of systems and infrastructure they will need to deliver the intended client experience, and how much customization and support they want — or need — to deliver that experience.


The hybrid practice model requires that advisors operate under a dual compliance structure: first, that of the RIA firm for which the advisor is an independent investment advisor, and second, that of the IBD for which the advisor is a registered representative. It's important to understand that any IBD the hybrid advisor associates with has an obligation to supervise their advisory business as well as the advisor's brokerage business, whether the advisor maintains an independent RIA or is doing business through the IBD's corporate RIA.

While IBD supervision for hybrid advisors is a given, when it comes to managing the RIA compliance function, advisors have two options.

Under the semi-captive approach, the advisor allows the IBD to assume direct management and oversight of all compliance functions, including RIA compliance.

For dually registered advisors, the RIA firm assumes responsibility for implementing and managing the RIA compliance function and having its own chief compliance officer, though some firms hire legal counsel or compliance consultants to help them. The IBD still manages compliance for its brokerage business and has some oversight for the advisory business.

Some key considerations here are the level of control you want over your compliance processes and your willingness and ability to manage your own compliance program. In evaluating the compliance aspects of the hybrid model, you'll want to consider your business mix — the percentage of your revenue that is fee-based and how much you plan to grow that area of your business. If, for example, your goal is to dramatically increase your fee-based revenues, you may not want to use a semi-captive approach where an IBD handles all of your compliance duties and charges an administrative fee for this oversight.

Economics, equity and ownership

The dually registered model through an independent RIA offers a path for entrepreneurial advisors seeking flexible compensation options. The semi-captive model is not a business entity that can be as easily monetized down the road. The right choice will depend largely on how much you want to be an owner and entrepreneur (and take on all the responsibilities that come with owning your own firm).

Other economic concerns such as gross revenues and payout structures also must be considered.

For example, the fee required of semi-captive advisors for compliance oversight and other support could equal as much as 15% of advisory revenue depending on the services they provide (versus around 5% for advisors in dually registered firms).

Semi-captive advisors also may face restrictions such as limits on retainer fees, asset management fees or planning fees. In short, being semi-captive and having easy access to existing support for compliance, infrastructure and other functions comes at an economic cost that must be considered when deciding on the most appropriate hybrid business model.

Ultimately, the choice to take one of the hybrid routes or to go completely independent is tied to an advisor's core identity, philosophy and business goals.

This decision will be informed by your answers to important questions regarding your clients' needs now and going forward, the types of investments you plan to offer, your ability and willingness to be an entrepreneur and owner, your need for various types of business and client-service support, your economic goals and other fundamental business planning issues that every advisor needs to consider.

Take the time to work through these and other issues carefully to set the stage for a successful transition to the hybrid model and take advantage of the many resources to help weigh your options.

Thoughtful and thorough planning now will enable you to build a business that is ideal to you and your clients — and that can thrive in the years ahead.


Nick Georgis is vice president of Schwab Advisor Services
where he heads practice management and strategic business
development. He can be reached at:
this email address.



Register or login for access to this item and much more

All On Wall Street content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access